LANDMARK LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST SEC TO PROTECT ALL WHISTLEBLOWERS
SEC WHISTLEBLOWER PROGRAM

SEC WHISTLEBLOWER APPLICATIONS DENIED TO DATE

The truth is, of the 7,000 or so submissions the SEC receives each year, the lion’s share never even make it to an investigative team. (Sidebar: our submissions usually do.) Nearly half of those denials didn’t make the cut because the submissions didn’t follow the program rules.

This keeps us awake at night.

Date Description Denial Justification Key Docs
9/08/2020 The SEC did not specify a reason for its denial of this Claimant's application. It merely noted the denial and Claimant’s non-appeal, in an Order providing an award to a different Claimant.
  • None Disclosed
8/31/2020 The SEC did not specify a reason for its denial of this Claimant's application. It merely noted the denial and Claimant’s non-appeal, in an Order providing an award to a different Claimant.
  • None Disclosed
8/17/2020 The SEC’s investigative team did not receive any information from the Claimant.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
8/13/2020 The SEC issued an opinion denying two appeals. It found that one Claimant reported only after the relevant company had self-reported, and his/her information thus was not “original.” The other claimed to have been the source for a newspaper article about similar unlawful conduct by a competitor, but this information wasn’t provided to the SEC nor did it impact the Covered Action.
  • Failed to Report a Securities Violation
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
  • Not Original Information
8/08/2020 The SEC’s investigation was ongoing when it received Claimant’s tip, which did not appear to be “original information” and did not contribute to the Covered Action.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
  • Not Original Information
8/08/2020 The SEC’s investigative team did not receive information from or communicate with the Claimant.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
8/08/2020 The SEC had already “opened, completed, and filed” the Covered Action prior to receiving Claimant’s tip, which was unrelated.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
7/31/2020 The SEC denied awards to Claimants because it had requested information from them before they provided it. The SEC also noted that Claimants appeared ineligible and failed to follow procedural rules.
  • Form and Manner of Submission/Application Did Not Comply With Program Rules
  • Ineligible Applicant
  • Information Not Voluntarily Provided
7/29/2020 No award for joint Claimants as the SEC filed the Covered Action before receiving their tip, which consisted of information that was already known, largely in the public domain, or otherwise general and non-specific.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
  • Not Original Information
7/23/2020 The SEC denied an award to joint Claimant/whistleblowers upon finding that the Covered Action was brought as a result of self-reporting, and Claimants’ information did not contribute.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
More in SEC Whistleblower Awards
Facts & Figures

Awards Granted
Named one of the top whistleblower practices/attorneys in the country by The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, NPR and The New Yorker
Thank you for submitting some email to us.