Whistleblower
Advocates
Award Winning Attorneys
The truth is, of the 7,000 or so submissions the SEC receives each year, the lion’s share never even make it to an investigative team. (Sidebar: our submissions usually do.) Nearly half of those denials didn’t make the cut because the submissions didn’t follow the program rules.
This keeps us awake at night.
Date | Description | Denial Justification | Key Docs |
---|---|---|---|
9/28/2020 | No reason specified. The SEC merely noted the denial and joint Claimants’ non-appeal, in an Order providing an award to another Claimant. |
|
|
9/25/2020 | No reason specified. The SEC merely noted the denial and joint Claimants’ non-appeal, in an Order providing an award to another Claimant. |
|
|
9/23/2020 | Claimant’s application was denied upon the SEC’s finding that he/she knowingly and willfully made false, fictitious or fraudulent representations in sworn testimony before Commission staff. |
|
|
9/21/2020 | No reason specified for denials of two applications. The SEC merely noted the denials and Claimants’ non-appeals, in an Order providing an award to another Claimant. |
|
|
9/20/2020 | Two Claimants’ appeals denied on the basis that they did not communicate with or provide any information to SEC Enforcement staff. Also, one of their award applications was not timely submitted. |
|
|
9/17/2020 | No reason specified for denials of two applications. The SEC merely noted the denials and Claimants’ non-appeals, in an Order providing an award to other Claimants. |
|
|
9/14/2020 | The SEC found that, inter alia, information provided by seven (7) Complainants concerned conduct in countries that were not relevant in the Covered Action. |
|
|
9/14/2020 | The SEC did not specify a reason for the denials of two Claimants’ applications. It merely noted the denials and Claimants’ non-appeals, in an Order providing an award to a different Claimant. |
|
|
9/14/2020 | The SEC’s investigative team did not receive information from or communicate with the Claimant. |
|
|
9/14/2020 | The SEC’s investigative team did not receive information from or communicate with the Claimant. |
|