LANDMARK LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST SEC TO PROTECT ALL WHISTLEBLOWERS
SEC WHISTLEBLOWER PROGRAM

SEC WHISTLEBLOWER APPLICATIONS DENIED TO DATE

The truth is, of the 7,000 or so submissions the SEC receives each year, the lion’s share never even make it to an investigative team. (Sidebar: our submissions usually do.) Nearly half of those denials didn’t make the cut because the submissions didn’t follow the program rules.

This keeps us awake at night.

Date Description Denial Justification Key Docs
10/25/2020 Five (5) Claimants were denied awards. Two did not appeal. The information from one of the three remaining Claimants was “not compelling enough.” Likewise, the information from the remaining two Claimants concerned conduct that was not charged.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
10/13/2020 The “Covered Action staff” did not communicate with or receive information from Claimant, whose tips did not concern the relevant factual or legal issues.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
10/09/2020 The SEC’s investigation was ongoing when it received Claimants’ tips, which were unrelated to the resulting Covered Action.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
10/09/2020 The information reported by Complainant was not relevant and/or was already known to the SEC.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
  • Not Original Information
10/05/2020 The SEC found that the information provided by Complainant concerned conduct in countries that were not relevant in the Covered Action.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
10/02/2020 The SEC’s Office of Market Intelligence marked Claimant’s tip “No Further Action.” This often means that the information did not relate to a securities violation.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
9/30/2020 The SEC did not specify a reason for the denials of awards to two Claimants, who did not appeal.
  • None Disclosed
9/30/2020 The SEC did not specify a reason for the denials of two Claimants’ applications. It merely noted the denials and Claimants’ non-appeals, in an Order providing an award to a different Claimant.
  • None Disclosed
9/29/2020 SEC staff had already begun investigating when Claimant submitted their tip, and the information did not advance that.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
9/28/2020 The Covered Action had already been filed when Claimant submitted his/her information, which was already known to the Commission.
  • Information Did Not Lead to the Successful Enforcement Action
  • Not Original Information
More in SEC Whistleblower Awards
Facts & Figures

Awards Granted
Named one of the top whistleblower practices/attorneys in the country by The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, NPR and The New Yorker
Thank you for submitting some email to us.